Comparing Dictators Adolf Hitler versus Benito Mussolini...

This essay will compare the three leaders who are famous for their dictatorship and totalitarianism during the 30s decade-Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini and Joseph Stalin. Totalitarianism is when a government gains absolute and total control over the country, including the freedom of thought and will as well as the citizen?s lifestyle, no other political parties are allowed and has the concept where the country is most important. The difference and similarity between their ideology, usage of propaganda censorship and the method of improving the economy would be stated and explained through examples. Basically, their ultimate aim was the same, they all tried to make their country better. However, there was their own ambition wanting for†¦show more content†¦During World War I, Hitler had joined the army and his experience especially his injury was believed to be one of the main reasons for him being so eager to improve his country quickly. His emotions such as pain and hatre d towards the army stimulated his hidden ambition. In Germany, Hitler used the power of enabling law to get rid of most things he didn?t want, for example he used his secret polices to arrest the opposition. On the other hand, under the influence of Marxism Stalin emphasized the idea of communism, where all citizens worked for the country is different from the concept of democracy where individuals have priority. In communism, a dictator leader is often needed in order to put the policies into practice, because other political parties cause the communism regime to fall apart, especially in undeveloped countries. The public needed to believe that communism was absolute and the only way to good life in order to make the system work smoothly. The similarities here were that they rejected all opposition political parties, but they used different concepts-Mussolini and Hitler did not introduce the communism idea. Now it comes to Hitler being unique, he introduced extreme racism and forced the idea throughout the country. Mussolini and Stalin did not have the racial unequal policy. He brought up the perfect German race policy, he believed that Jewish people was theShow MoreRelatedOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pages(2006): 1–28. 46. Patrick K. O’Brien and Leandro Prados de la Escosura, â€Å"Agricultural Productivity and European Industrialization, 1890–1980,† Economic History Review 45, no. 3 (1992): 514–536. 47. Moya, Cousins and Strangers, 150–153, 266–276. Joseph P. Ferrie, â€Å"History Lessons: The End of American Exceptionalism? Mobility in the United States since 1850,† Journal of Economic Perspectives 19, no. 3 (2005): 199–215 also shows exceptionally high levels 50 †¢ CHAPTER 1 of upward mobility

Am Certain and It Is Certain Free Essays

Two very specific different messages are conveyed when one says â€Å"l am certain† versus â€Å"it is certain. When one says â€Å"l am certain,† it is understood by the recipient to mean that the individual is in the highest mental state of being without a doubt. However, this differs from â€Å"It Is certain† because the word â€Å"It† Implies a consensus genteel, an agreement, without a doubt, between many humans In making a knowledge claim. We will write a custom essay sample on Am Certain and It Is Certain or any similar topic only for you Order Now In both cases a knowledge claim Is being made with confidence, but one person’s certainty Is based on the Individual’s perception, Intuition. Season or emotion, whereas a whole group of mankind making a knowledge claim depends on many different people’s perceptions, reasons, and emotions. Since a great number of people consists of many individuals and their unique perceptions, reasons, and emotions, when a knowledge claim is made by all, the claim is transferred from simply a belief to a Justified belief. However, even though the number of people may vary from one to many, we must take into consideration the fact that there are various degrees of certainty. How would one quantify amount of certainty one holds, or be able to create a universal scale for measuring degrees of certainty? Certainty within a people or an individual can have been rooted from many efferent factors, of which one is passionate conviction. The question, addressing passionate conviction, Inquires whether It Is ever sufficient for Justifying knowledge claim. The question Is Implying whether passionate conviction alone, not Including reason, is sufficient for justifying knowledge claims. Passionate conviction that does not take root in reason must be coming from solely the emotional state, which is not sufficient for Justifying knowledge in most cases because further evidence should be presented and should be able to be agreed upon from one’s perception (if possible ND reason. â€Å"l am passionately convinced that daffodils bloom in the springtime† is a knowledge claim that is based on reason and perception, which fuel the passionate conviction. However, passionate conviction that isn’t based on other ways of knowing is usually not sufficient for Justifying claims. However, there are a few instances where passionate convictions may be sufficient for Justifying knowledge. Since passionate conviction Is rooted In emotion, an emotion can dictate your passionate conviction. If I feel empathy for someone being treated abusively, my passionate invention may be enough to Justify my â€Å"knowledge† that the other person desires to not De put tongue ten solution. However, tender are, again many Deterrent levels AT passionate conviction. How would you measure the degree of passionate conviction? Furthermore, is one basis for passionate conviction more valuable than another basis for passionate conviction, and does that change the strength of one’s passionate conviction? These are a few knowledge issues that need to be identified and taken into consideration when deciding whether passionate conviction is sufficient for justifying knowledge. How to cite Am Certain and It Is Certain, Papers

Economic Valuation Keynesian Investment

Question: Discuss about theEconomic Valuationfor Keynesian Investment. Answer: Table 1(GDP) 2007 2012 2017 2022 Without Investment GDP Deflator 1 0.68 1 1.316 Nominal GDP (($, bn) 1240 740 1325 1000 Real GDP (2017 prices, $, bn) 1240 1090 1325 760 With investment A Real (2017 prices) 525 B Real (2017 prices) 225 Proposal A is recommended as the real value of A is greater than that of B. No. Hyper inflation makes production costlier reducing the value of money. Required investment $738.4bn 2012 GDP = $2032bn, 2022 GDP = $1700bn Required investment = $2032(1+ 20%) = $738.4 Yes, because, project B is more prospective. MPC = DC/DY = (600 -500) / (2250 -990) = .079 MPS = 1- MPC = 0.92 Keynesian reasoning, Because, Keynesian investment is based on autonomous investment such as based on marginal efficiency of capital and rate of interest (Arrow and Kruz 2013) No, If all income is saved MPC would be zero. Then there would be no demand for investment and hence GDP may decrease in future (Lund 2014). References Arrow, K.J. and Kruz, M., 2013.Public investment, the rate of return, and optimal fiscal policy(Vol. 1). Routledge. Lund, P.J., 2014.Investment: The study of an economic aggregate(Vol. 13). Elsevier.